Le dimanche 17 septembre 2006 à 23:28 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : > > Sorry, too late... The bug is 12 days old, not one day... If the > package would > have been binNMUable, there would have been no need to upload a source > NMU in > the first place. I don't know why you would object this NMU unless you > want to > keep libtasn1-2 in the archive or don't want gnomeicu in etch?
That bin-NMU bug was a normal bug until yesterday, the libtasn1-2 was set as important. Which means there was no hurry to fix them. Somebody changed the settings yesterday and you NMUed the same day, do you consider that as a normal way of NMUing? Not waiting a day and not contacting the maintainer first? I object to the NMU because a NMU was not required and you didn't try to contact the maintainer first which is not a nice way to act
