Hi David, Thanks for your response!
On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 00:23 +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote: > El sábado, 7 de octubre de 2006 12:43, Andree Leidenfrost escribió: > > Hi David, > > > > Ok, I have NMU'ed with a five day delay (rather than the requested > > seven). I have also set the urgency to medium. So unless you pull the > > pin during the delay period, this will go into unstable in five days > > time and into testing just before the freeze. > > Hello, Andree. Thanks for the patience you had with this issue. My > main > development box was giving segfaults all the time if I had it turned on for a > couple of days. So I have been testing and stressing with Knoppix to see if > my hardware or my software was at fault (it was the latter, it seems). No worries, And, well, at least you don't have to buy new hardware. ;-) Glad to hear you solved you computer problem! > Last Sunday Amaya told me about your message, so probably it is a good > way > for contacting me :-) Yeah, Amaya is great! :-) > > I have only applied the patch as attached to this bug report. I have not > > done any other changes to the package. > > > > I sincerely hope this is fine with you. > > Yes, it is fine (you should have send to the bug a full patch with the > NMU > diff, but other that that, it is fine). Not sure I understand this one: How would the NMU diff be different from the patch I did attach to the bug report originally. (I'm obviously missing something here and would be glad if you could tell me.) > I am currently building a package including your patch. Thank you very > much. Well, thank you very much! :-) I'm glad that you still have enough time to pull the pin on the NMU and produce a 'proper' upload. > Best regards, > > > Ender. Cheers, Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost @ Debian Developer Sydney - Australia
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
