El martes, 10 de octubre de 2006 11:32, Andree Leidenfrost escribió: > Hi David, > > Thanks for your response!
> > Yes, it is fine (you should have send to the bug a full patch with the
> > NMU diff, but other that that, it is fine).
>
> Not sure I understand this one: How would the NMU diff be different from
> the patch I did attach to the bug report originally. (I'm obviously
> missing something here and would be glad if you could tell me.)
You should include the changelog part as well. That is, the full diff
between
the latest version and your NMUed version, and thus preferrably from the
package root directory, so the patch would have been like:
--- ntfsprogs-1.13.1.orig/debian/changelog
+++ ntfsprogs-1.13.1/debian/changelog
@ 0,0 @ blabla
+ ntfsprogs (1.13.1-3.1) distribution...
blabla
...
I hope it is clearer now. :-)
> > I am currently building a package including your patch. Thank you very
> > much.
>
> Well, thank you very much! :-) I'm glad that you still have enough time
> to pull the pin on the NMU and produce a 'proper' upload.
I have to guess now how to remove the package from DELAYED-n... :-)
Best regards,
Ender.
--
Network engineer
Debian Developer
pgpmE45g4MFqO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
