also sprach Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.28.1546 +0200]: > Your wrappers are full or personal customizations. I think a lot of > people are customizing their systems like this.
Exactly why I think we should move the feature upstream. > - this would make it rather hard to handle dist-upgrades of the > contents of the pbuilder (how do we detect a change from sarge to > etch? should we rename the tarball after the upgrade?) or mixtures > of various distribution (how do you name a pbuilder which is setup > for sid + $company repository?) this is up to you. > - this naming scheme is arbitrary, we could base the name on the login > of the unix user doing "sudo pbuilder create" yup. > The most flexible approach remains (IMO) the current one where this is > simply configurable. pbuilder has so many complexities that I just would not call it simply configurable; you can do so much wrong. Even just command line handling is a major PITA at times. > Out of curiosity: what's this "phoenix" shell you're using? http://svn.madduck.net/pub/bin/base/phoenix I exited the chroot too many times by accident. :) -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
