Hi,
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:19:55 +0100, Nikolaus Rath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I know the WNPP package; I reported this to gnus because I think it
> might be sensible not to make a separate package and instead include
> starttls directly in gnus. Reasons:
> - It's quite small, there will likely be more packaging overhead
> than code
Gnus is a large package, having it not be arch: all is not
such a good idea.
> - It's of absolute no use without gnus. It doesn't even contain
> information on how to use it
Well, it can then depend on Gnus (if it is of no use without
it). Gnus can then suggest it.
> - WNPP has *a lot* of RFP bugs. I hoped that the gnus maintainer
> might be interested in the program.
> That said, I'll of course fill a WNPP bug if aren't interested or if
> it's technically bad to include it directly in gnus.
Well, since the starttls source is not part of the Gnus
sources, this is something I do not like to do (that is, munge
different sources into one debian source). So, please, yes, do ask
for a separate package for this.
Secondly,
--
Stay away from hurricanes for a while.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
