Hi, > Is it really necessary to rename the source package when removing RFCs? > > Other packages only add dfsg to the upstream version number, which has > the advantage of not breaking source package based monitoring > mechanisms.
Indeed, please change this back, preferably for etch. It is explicitly listed as a reason for immediate rejection from the NEW queue: http://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html (first table last row) thanks, Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
