> Since 2.99.1.3-2 this here:
> > HTMLOPTIONS="-F html,graph"
> is -F html without "graph". So, for most of the users, the
> problem should not arise: They upgrade from stable and have a
> version without graphics. When then want to have graphics, they
> have manually change the script and install the package.
well -- I don't mind... it is your call -- I just gave a suggestion.
Since I am not sure if "most of the users" are on stable at the moment,
so you might get surprised on how many would encounter the problem, then
good ones would dig into Documentation and bug tracking system to find
the cause, and, in the best case, noone would buzz you since this issue
was raisen up (now). But since MANY users use it in testing/unstable I
would just keep on recommending the proper NEWS entry so they get
alarmed... or postinst conditioning, grepping of cron file to see if
HTMLOPTIONS includes graph and necessary package is installed... If not
- fat warning. that would be the best solution, but since it requires
  hand scripting - that is up to you... feel free to close the issue -
  it is solved for me, so I am somewhat happy ;-)

-- 
                                  .-.
=------------------------------   /v\  ----------------------------=
Keep in touch                    // \\     (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko              /(   )\               ICQ#: 60653192
                   Linux User    ^^-^^    [175555]


Attachment: pgpoOhSIVGLbw.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to