On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:52:09 +0100, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> ucfq without a full patch makes some sense, however: Maybe only if a
> switch specifies "interactive mode".
Well. It would add complexity to the code; and it is easy
enough to type in the full path name with modern shell tab
completion -- I am not sure the increased complexity is worth the
increase in convenience.
This will have to be a case of features that might get added
if someone contributes tested patches :)
manoj
--
And miles to go before I sleep. Robert Frost
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
