On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:25:06PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > tags 414691 + wontfix > thanks > > Re: Bill Allombert 2007-03-13 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Circular dependencies involving shared libraries are known to cause > > problems during upgrade, so we should try to get rid of them. > > In this case the libyada-* packages are just wrappers to facilitate > depending on the right sql backend libs. No programs will end up > linking against these libs, so all that needs to be done is upgrading > these (if installed) along with libyada4. (They even have sonames, so > if libyada4 bumps, they will too.)
In that case why do the libyada-* packages need to depend on libyada ? As long libyada itself depends on the right libyada-* version everything should be fine. Adding circular dependencies never make upgrades easier. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large blue swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
