#25: RESPONSECODE definition in pcsc-lite moved to ifdhandler.h
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: aj | Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Component: general
Version: 0.6.11 | Severity: normal
Resolution: | Keywords:
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by Ludovic):
A patch is available in http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-
devel/2007-March/009616.html
It is not possible to compile OpenCT with pcsc-lite 1.4.0
[http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/dev/muscle/2007-q1/0144.html]. See
Debian bug #414715 [http://bugs.debian.org/414715].
This is because of two problems:
* OpenCT comes with its own version of ifdhandler.h instead of using the
one provided by pcsc-lite
* OpenCT uses the IFDhandler API v2 and IFDHControl() function is not
defined the same with IFDhandler API v3 and so conflicts.
A simple patch is to remove ifdhandler.h from OpenCT and do:
{{{
Index: src/pcsc/Makefile.am
===================================================================
--- src/pcsc/Makefile.am (révision 935)
+++ src/pcsc/Makefile.am (copie de travail)
@@ -14,8 +14,6 @@ openct_ifd_la_SOURCES = pcsc.c
openct_ifd_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version
openct_ifd_la_LIBADD = ../ctapi/libopenctapi.la
-noinst_HEADERS = ifdhandler.h
-
# Don't use HAVE_BUNDLES for this case, pcsc-lite loads
# USB drivers from MacOS X like bundles for all platforms
install-exec-local: install-libLTLIBRARIES
Index: src/pcsc/pcsc.c
===================================================================
--- src/pcsc/pcsc.c (révision 935)
+++ src/pcsc/pcsc.c (copie de travail)
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
#endif
#include <openct/openct.h>
#include "ctapi.h" /* XXX: <openct/ctapi.h>? */
+#define IFDHANDLERv2
#include "ifdhandler.h"
/* Maximum number of readers handled */
@@ -423,6 +424,8 @@ IFDHTransmitToICC(DWORD Lun, SCARD_IO_HE
return rv;
}
+#ifdef IFDHANDLERv2
+
RESPONSECODE
IFDHControl(DWORD Lun, PUCHAR TxBuffer,
DWORD TxLength, PUCHAR RxBuffer, PDWORD RxLength)
@@ -469,6 +472,17 @@ IFDHControl(DWORD Lun, PUCHAR TxBuffer,
return rv;
}
+#else
+
+RESPONSECODE IFDHControl(DWORD Lun, DWORD dwControlCode,
+ PUCHAR TxBuffer, DWORD TxLength, PUCHAR RxBuffer, DWORD RxLength,
+ PDWORD pdwBytesReturned)
+{
+ /* FIXME */
+}
+
+#endif
+
RESPONSECODE IFDHICCPresence(DWORD Lun)
{
char ret;
}}}
I have no idea if OpenCT should use the API v3
[http://pcsclite.alioth.debian.org/ifdhandler-3/] or stay at API v2.
--
Ticket URL: <https://www.opensc-project.org/openct/ticket/25>
OpenCT <http://www.opensc-project.org/>
