also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.04.04.1311 +0200]: > I understand perfectly your position... i don't say that your request is > not good, but the current behavior is "a sane default". I think unison > developper won't pay attention to things that require to change a lot of > things making the whole thing very complicated... Recovering from > unexpected interrupt is a tricky business, i hope you understand that > unison team try to keep the thing simple (i talk as maintainer of unison > since i am not part of unison team -- maybe they will agree without > discussion to your request).
Yes, I understand, and I do not have a good solution to propose. Maybe the limitation could be documented in the manpage though? Synchronisation and file transfers cannot be resumed if they're cancelled in the middle of transfer entities, which could be files, or directories if the entire directory is new. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
