Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> That's a side-effect of the change introduced for #383542 in the last 
> version, in order not to create changelogs resembling the above but only 
> one block per maintainer.

Eh, I object. When I added multi-maintainer support to dch, I explicitly 
made it support multiple blocks per maintainer, because I know that in
complex packages with lots of maintainers, one maintainer's changelog
entry often depends on an earlier changelog entry by a different
maintainer, and needs to come last. Please don't break this.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to