On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 12:40:15PM -0700, Bradley Bell wrote: > >I'm using gtkmm a lot these days and I noticed that upstream has already > >released gtkmm 2.10.9. Is there a problem packaging it or are you > >perhaps short on time? If you want I can help package gtkmm 2.10.9 (and > >glibmm 2.12.8, on which it depends). > > > > Once I have a chance, I will review the dependencies, and then upload the > newest possible versions for unstable and experimental.
I've succesfully built gtkmm 2.10.9 and glibmm 2.12.8 packages. They
didn't need any changes to the packaging. I didn't experience any
problems with gtkmm programs that I've been using. Several other people
have requested gtkmm 2.10 in the mean time, because their packages
depend on it. I will therefore do a NMU tomorrow.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
