[Török Edvin] > The dependency graph says that 'lighttpd' depends on networking, and > is started before the 'mountall'. However lighttpd is working > correctly.
Sounds like a bug in the dependency list. > So I wonder if removing the mountall dependency from programs that > don't necesarely need it would break anything. Well, getting the dependency list correct is not supposed to break anything. Check <URL:http://wiki.debian.org/?LSBInitScripts> for some clues on how to get it right. > I mean programs taht don't need anything besides / and /etc to be > mounted on startup. A quick look on the graph shows some > candidates: lm-sensors, urandom, cpufrequtils, smartmontools, > acpi-support. There are three 'facilities' I suspect are correct for these. The $network, $local_fs and $remote_fs. Most scripts should depend on $remote_fs to make sure all partitions are mounted before it is started. Network services should run before $network. > Worth trying, or the risk of breakage is too high? Should I open > separate wishlist bugs for these? It is worth trying, and I would very much welcome help getting all packages to fix their dependencies. See also <URL:http://initscripts-ng.alioth.debian.org/soc2006-bootsystem/> for more info on the topic. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
