On 6/3/07, Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I definitely need texlive-latex-extra, but it's worse than that. The new texlive infrastructure isn't quite a true superset of tetex, so I also had to patch latex.py to remove references to the fancyheader package, which isn't available in texlive at all.
I fixed this; apparently, an alternate package fancyhdr exists in texlive.
After these changes, things seem to work fine, and I'll upload a new package shortly.
One more note: I had to add a few extra texlive dependencies to the list. The total list is now: gs-common python-tk texlive-latex-base texlive-latex-extra texlive-latex-recommended texlive-fonts-recommended I found that without the two -recommended packages, I would end up with a mixed texlive and tetex system. Adding those two packages resolved all of aptitude's confusion. If, when you upgrade to this new version, you see any dependency-related problems, please let me know. It seems to be working for me right now. Thanks for the help. KEN -- Kenneth J. Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cedar-solutions.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
