Le dimanche 1 juillet 2007 16:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 15:48:43 -0400, Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Le samedi 30 juin 2007 19:09, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : > >> On Sat, 19 May 2007 16:16:34 -0400, Filipus Klutiero > >> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> > selinux-policy-refpolicy-targeted is priority standard, but it is > >> > unusual to be found without priority optional package > >> > checkpolicy. This means that default installations would be > >> > unusual. > >> > >> I would consider a standard only installation unusual, yes. > > > > If a default installation is unusual, is there any installation that > > you wouldn't consider unusual? > > How many machines running Debian have you seen with only > standard packages installed? The standard only install does not come > with X, gcc/apache. or any other server or user oriented software. You're the one that moved the discussion to installs with only standard packages. I am talking about default installations.
In any case, asking me a question doesn't answer the question I asked you. Even though my question may sound rhetoric, it's serious. > > > If answering no to the previous question doesn't make you realize > > the inconsistency, just think 10 seconds about the current > > situation. > > If you have indeed thought about the situation, you do need to > step back and figure out why only depends relationships are supposed > to be self contained. I don't know what you mean by self contained relationships.
