On Saturday 14 July 2007 12:01, Robert Millan wrote: > To be honest, I have to say that I don't like the possibility of my code > becoming non-free. That said, I always find it a reasonable compromise to > allow this for the sake of merging the code upstream when the upstream > maintainers require it.
Although I too love FSF-free software, I personally wouldn't mess with the licensing for a not so major patch like this is. On the other hand, it'd be distributed as a separate dpatch so it'd be easy for anyone to redistribute or rebuild the package without it. -- Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian libspf2 maintainer (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpuO2NXxr227.pgp
Description: PGP signature
