On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 07:19:52PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Unfortunately, at some point one of the reversions has ended up > immediately preceeded by a return() and therefore been skipped. The > attached trivial patch should fix that. Could you please apply it and > see if that resolves the issue for you?
This seems to fix it for me. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
