Package: guile-1.8
Version: 1.8.2+1-2
Severity: normal

Building gnucash results in this error:
checking for guile... /usr/bin/guile
checking for guile - 1.6.0 <= version < 99.99.99... yes: 1.6.8
checking for guile - 1.8.0 <= version < 99.99.99... no: 1.6.8
checking for SLIB support... configure: error:

   Cannot find SLIB.  Are you sure you have it installed?
   See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347922


make: *** [config.status] Error 1

That bug report recommends testing the results of:
$ guile -c "(use-modules (ice-9 slib)) (require 'printf)"
ERROR: Could not find slib/require.scm in  ("/usr/share/guile/site"
"/usr/share/guile/1.8" "/usr/share/guile")

Compare :
$ guile-1.6 -c "(use-modules (ice-9 slib)) (require 'printf)"
with:
$ guile-1.8 -c "(use-modules (ice-9 slib)) (require 'printf)"
ERROR: Could not find slib/require.scm in  ("/usr/share/guile/site"
"/usr/share/guile/1.8" "/usr/share/guile")

g-wrap currently depends on guile-1.8 although gnucash depends on
guile-1.6. Whilst trying to fix problems caused by g-wrap 1.9.9, I now
come across this problem in guile-1.8 which prevents me working out how
to build gnucash against g-wrap 1.9.9.

The problem affects gnucash 2.0.5-1.1 AND the current gnucash SVN HEAD.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-2-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages guile-1.8 depends on:
ii  guile-1.8-libs            1.8.2+1-2      Main Guile libraries
ii  libc6                     2.6.1-2        GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgmp3c2                 2:4.2.1+dfsg-5 Multiprecision arithmetic library
ii  libltdl3                  1.5.24-1       A system independent dlopen wrappe

guile-1.8 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to