Hi,
Mathias Gug a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 10:50:01PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
A first concern comes with the dedicated group name. Should we use
"smbshare" and then still advertise that obsolete acronym (SMB) which
is however known by nearly everybody?
Does this really have to be hardcoded ?
Another proposal is to use a group named fileshare, that could be used
to define a list of users that are allowed to define shared directories
on the network (via samba, nfs, ftp or any other protocol).
+1
Best
Jé
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
