Quoting Jérémie Tarot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Hi, > > Mathias Gug a écrit : > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 10:50:01PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > >> A first concern comes with the dedicated group name. Should we use > >> "smbshare" and then still advertise that obsolete acronym (SMB) which > >> is however known by nearly everybody? > >> > > Does this really have to be hardcoded ?
If we create the system group in the package's postinst, yes. We have to choose a group name. > > > Another proposal is to use a group named fileshare, that could be used > > to define a list of users that are allowed to define shared directories > > on the network (via samba, nfs, ftp or any other protocol). > > +1 That'd needs some discussion on -devel first, then.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
