On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 07:23:53AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 10:28:24PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > >Armel arch needs atleast -march=armv4t to work, which is the > >default for gcc on it. However, since -9 -> -10, perl started > >applying -march=armv3 for armel. This appears to be due to a fix > >to actually apply -march=armv3 for the old arm port.
> When I was adding a case for sh4 I noticed fixed a typo which prevented the > arm special case from being applied. > Darn, should have left well enough alone. I've removed the special case > now. Thanks for prompt response and fix. I don't think you should feel bad about trying to fix nonworking code - leaving it alone would have just kept this bug hidden. Cheers, Riku -- "rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
