[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > It is possible, and useful, to use 'scdaemon' without gpgsm: with > gpg2. Shouldn't scdaemon be in a separate package?
Alternatively, scdaemon could be moved into the gnugp-agent package. The only component of the gnupg2 system that actually uses the scdaemin directly is the gpg-agent, the other components -- gpg2 and gpgsm -- use it via the agent. So it would be more sensible for the scdaemon to be in the gnupg-agent packge than in the gpgsm package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
