-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > best choice for users. Looks like some installed the unofficial package,
you meant to say "unofficial and broken", right? As libsvg is per definition a broken package name. > > they will get upgrade errors and blame it on Debian. That might be not > > true but users tend to blame it on the distribution. Adding the Replaces Users blame bogus things on anyone. But *they* are doing bogus things by installing broken beryl packages and beryl did broken things by providing broken packages. > > would be trivial, not have any side effect and allow those users to have Indeed it's trivial. > > It won't remove beryl? (Note it's Conflicts:, too. otherwise it really > doesn't make sense). And which time the users who installed beryl will > also complain, won't they? That would be solvable by also providing libsvg, but... *shrugs* Grüße/Regards, René - -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHQ/su+FmQsCSK63MRAuV0AJ9Oh5LwCR4WbPOunPTuiXp0gXzPSgCeLxYW 4hQo0Afokwx71jRSnsb57SQ= =Lhhw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
