Niko Tyni wrote: > I'm still not sure if it's worth it to rename, though.
Gregor Herrmann wrote: > Considering the arguments with versioned dependencies I'm inclined to > propose to stick with the current name. Cost: This would be a one-time action, and we can easily supply a dummy "libmime-perl" binary package that depends on the renamed binary package for backwards compatibility. Benefit: Less confusion for all users searching for the package providing MIME-tools / MIME::Tools in the future.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
