On Nov 30, 2007 11:04 AM, Niko Tyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 01:38:13PM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>
> > I am for renaming (plus a transitional package).
>
> So am I, the existence of MIME/Tools.pm tips the scales for me.
> FWIW, I think it makes sense to rename both the source and the
> binary package in the same go.

Maybe it's not worth the effort to put it in the NEW queue... that's
really only cosmetic. In any case, I don't have a strong opinion
against it.

-- 
Martín Ferrari


Reply via email to