Maximilian et al: I see that several things have happend regarding this bug, most notably that busybox has moved from 'Depends' to 'Recommends' (and that the bug itself has moved from 'critical' to 'wishlist'). I am not sure of all of the consequences of this, although it appears from the changelog that most of the functionality required is present via binaries from klibc, possibly excepting tools needed for md/lvm root configs (i.e. the control file states, "klibc provides utilities to setup root. Having the root on EVMS, MD, LVM2, LUKS or NFS is also supported.", but it is not clear that this is still true if *some* version of busybox is not installed.) Is this correct: Will md/lvm root configs function (at all) when busybox is not present?
I also see why 'busybox-initramfs' is available as an alternative (for Ubuntu boxes). Is there some reason not to also have 'busybox-static' available as an alternative, especially since this is now just 'Recommends'? Thanks, -- Steve Lane System, Network and Security Administrator Doudna Lab Biomolecular Structure and Mechanism Group UC Berkeley -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]