On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 21:22 +0100, Mirco Bauer wrote: > Package: boo > Severity: wishlist > > Dear boo package maintainer, > > There are new upstream versions [0][1][2] of boo available. > One of my packages [3] need a newer version of boo in a new upstream > version. Please update boo to a new version, as it blocks my package > update [4] from entering debian.
Sorry for the delay. I was planning on updating boo, but the last time I looked I think support for the mono 1.x was dropped, so only the 2.x packages can be made now. However, this is no reason not to upgrade so I will do so ASAP. > > If you don't have time to update boo, I am available to help via a NMU. > > [0] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/BOO/2007/06/23/Boo+0.7.8+is+Here%21 > [1] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/BOO/2007/09/01/Boo+0.7.9 > [2] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/BOO/2007/10/27/Boo+0.80 > [3] http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/monodevelop.html > > PS: I would like to see boo packaged part of pkg-cli-libs [4][5] in a > team fashion, if you are interested please tell me. > > [4] http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-cli-libs/ > [5] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-cli-libs/packages/ Sure, I think that probably makes sense. I'll do this with my next upload. Is the process more complicated than simply updating the maintainer field? I'll read up the website and hopefully get this done next week. -- sam clegg :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369 $superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
