Hi Michael, Sorry for the delay to get back to you.
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006, Michael Hanke wrote: > I'm currently packaging VXL: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=390999 Sam Hocevar had a look at VXL and saw that libvo is used in a small numnber of places; he wasn't able to tell whether it would be easy or not to do without it. libvo could be shipped as a new binary package, but it's usefulness would be dubious and this would require some work; we'd recommend to check whether you can package VXL without it: perhaps VXL's upstream would consider not depending on libvo? If it turns out that VXL strongly needs libvo, please ping this bug and we'll work with upstream to properly ship it. Bye, -- Loïc Minier
