On su, 2007-12-23 at 11:47 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > This make me believe that if update-rc.d is changed to allow other > locations, the documentation need to change a the same time.
Yes, of course. > [Lars Wirzenius 2006-06-24] > > This means that a sysadmin who wants to write a policy layer has to > > put it into /usr/sbin, instead of /usr/local/sbin. This seems > > suboptimal. ... > > These two comments are the only claims I find in the BTS report that > this change is _needed_, and neither explain why. Hardcoded paths are bad in general, requiring policy-rc.d to be in /usr/sbin rather than anywhere on the path is not an exception, as far as I care. I am not, however, particularly interested in hammering this into other people's heads if they don't see the light. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
