On Jan 10, 2008 6:32 AM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 30/09/07 at 16:36 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Package: tmda > > Version: 1.0.3-1.1 > > Severity: serious > > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Usertags: proposed-removal > > > > Hi, > > > > While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package > > came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: > > > > * Upstream doesn't want TMDA to be included in a stable release. > > * The package is outdated, there's a 1.1.12 release available from > > tmda.net > > * last maintainer upload in 2004 > > * there are probably better alternatives, for which the maintainer > > doesn't object to inclusion in stable releases > > * only 18 popcon insts > > The situation didn't change. Requesting removal.
Doesn't this package also grossly violate applicable RFCs regarding reliable email delivery? -- Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
