On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Roger Leigh wrote: > Perhaps you might consider splitting out a separate gettext-dev > package in that case? I also notice a fair amount of libraries and > headers which might benefit from this.
Whatever is done, there will always be somebody who will not like it. gettext is already a -dev package. Splitting gettext even more would be confusing. I can already see the complains: "the INSTALL document says to install gettext, which I did, but foo still does not build because of a missing header". I understand your complain "autopoint does not work without cvs", but it's easily solved by installing cvs. Please understand the alternate complain that would result by making the suggests on cvs stronger: "I'm just a translator and I don't need cvs at all, I don't want to have it installed". -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
