-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 08:45:54PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: >maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> kernel-package is even no longer a supported way to build linux-2.6 > >Ah, that's interesting. I don't see any documentation on this in >kernel-package in sid, nor a bug report requesting to add it. I do see >that kernel-package has quite a lot of rather old bugs (both in terms of >submission, and of last modified), but that doesn't mean one shouldn't >use the package... > >Manoj, don't you think you should indicate in your package if >development of Debian kernels and kernel-package has so much diverged >that it gets hard for you to keep them working together (it seems you >don't get support on this from the kernel-package maintainers...)
I believe replacing "Debian kernels" with "kernels by the kernel-team" in the sentence above is more to the point. And that such adjustment clarifies the controversy lurking here: Manoj cares about packaging kernels. Max cares about the kernel-team packaging kernels. It seems this bug has stranded at the wrong spot: Max got away with a false[1] statement and Manoj is obviously never going to update kernel-package documentation base don it. - Jonas [1] As of today, linux-2.6 build-depends on kernel-package. - -- Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.jones.dk/~jonas/ IT-guide dr. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dr.jones.dk/ +45 40843136 Debian GNU/Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.org/ GnuPG(1024D/C02440B8): 9A98 C6EB C098 9ED0 3085 ECA9 9FB0 DB32 C024 40B8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHpPQHn7DbMsAkQLgRAkJ+AJoCaTptEMpbBpVL9z52BUvkffaupQCfWcRz UrRTHjNFRPKGTqxvIU+zHgU= =XAaI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
