Peter Eisentraut writes: > Matthias Klose wrote: > > The package does contain the jni bindings, not the BC compiled jar > > files, so the packages is wrongly named. The package description should > > make it clear, that the package contains the jni bindings. > > Where is this policy documented, and why does it matter?
2.4 of the Java Policy for the -jni naming; the -gcj naming is not mentioned there. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
