On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 12:07:33PM +0000, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> >Ah, right. The ordering of MANDATORY_MANPATH does matter,
> 
> This is (fortunately for the status of this bug) not true as far as I can 
> see. My /etc/manpath.config currently contains:
> 
> MANDATORY_MANPATH                       /usr/man
> MANDATORY_MANPATH                       /usr/share/man
> MANDATORY_MANPATH                       /usr/local/share/man
> 
> and manpath says:
> 
> $ manpath
> /usr/local/share/man:/usr/share/man:/usr/local/epocemx/man:/home/rrt/local/man

The entries from MANDATORY_MANPATH are added after processing PATH, so
their order only matters if PATH is empty.

I'll reverse their order for good measure.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to