On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 08:26:19AM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: > On 08/02/06 00:00 +0530, Kumar Appaiah said ... > > However, if you insist that this causes confusion and is not right, > > I'll consider adding this functionality. > > Not really, you are the maintainer and what you decide would be mostly > right :). If I think more about it, flickcurl-utils and libflickcurl0 > are supposed to be used together and probably keeping it all together > perhaps makes sense. > > In any case, just add flickcurl-utils to libflickcurl0-dbg's Depends. > It is missing right now.
I appreciate this observation. If this is the case, would you mind if I close the bug with this change? Or would you like me to tag this as wontfix? Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
