On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 18:44 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > On 07/02/2008, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > That is a false alarm, the line in question does not use $(< foo), but > > $(< foo command), which is a valid construct and works at least in > > dash and bash. [...]
As James said, that's already fixed in SVN. > There are some other, possible, bugs on checkbashisms on its detection > of kill being called with a numeric value which I'll report as soon as > I confirm it is a bug. That test was added very recently during the resync with lintian's tests. I'll check with them as it does look like it might be a little overzealous in what it catches. Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
