On 08/02/2008, Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 23:40 -0500, James Vega wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 06:44:06PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > On 07/02/2008, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > That is a false alarm, the line in question does not use $(< foo), but > > > > $(< foo command), which is a valid construct and works at least in > > > > dash and bash. > > > > > > > > May I suggest not using the latest and greatest checkbashisms script > > > > for mass bug filing until the script has shown to be reasonably bug > > > > free? > > > > > > Thanks for pointing that out, hopefully someone will fix checkbashisms. > > > > This was actually fixed in devscripts' SVN earlier today. > > Indeed. Please check before filing duplicates. :)
I did check on the checkbashisms section of the BTS page, but seems like the bug wasn't usertagged. > > #464522 was filed by Marc himself yesterday after your (Raphael) report > against aide was discussed between us (and others) on #debian-devel and > agreed it was a bug. > > Adam > Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Say NO to Microsoft Office broken standard. See http://www.noooxml.org/petition -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
