Hello,

* Martin Kelly [Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:10:22PM -0800]:
> You're right: gmp-ecm is just as portable as pyecm. Sorry about that.
> 
> As for the "faster" claim, I believe I was mistaken. On some tests it 
> seemed to be, but upon further testing gmps-ecm is faster by a constant 
> factor of about 3.
> 
> Pyecm's main advantage is ease of use. I apologize for the innacurate 
> description (no harm intended) and will change it in the next version, 
> which should be coming within a few months.

No problem. Thanks!

Laurent.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to