Craig Small wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 04:29:47PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > Here's a good explanation about what procps is doing: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2002/2/18/187 > It's not quite how it does it. procps uses a delta or change in the > values.
I don't see any delta. ps doesn't wait for multiple values.. > > If I sum all the cpu values and divide by uptime, I get 100, every time. > But is that the correct value? I'm worried that this masks the actual > problem. I don't know how to figure out what the real value is for a given machine. > I'll try to work out why all numbers are not added. Probably has something to do with this code having been written for 2.4 :-) -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
