martin f krafft wrote: > logcheck-database exists as a bag for rules that are not in the > packages. If a package provides its own rule files, the > logcheck-database must not.
Yes, that makes very good sense. I've just added the missing rule from 1.2.63 logcheck-database to lpr package. Does this mean the bug should be reassigned to logcheck-database? - Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
