On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:33:48PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> Does this mean the bug should be reassigned to logcheck-database?
The appropriate action, IMO, would be to Replace: logcheck-database; we
can then remove that file at our leisure. (I for one am using l-d from
backports.org on my servers, so I'd favor waiting until after lenny's
release.)
--
Being overloaded is the sign of a true Debian maintainer.
-- JHM on #Debian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
