On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 04:41:04PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Le March 29, 2008 04:29:42 pm Aurelien Jarno, vous avez écrit : > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 03:39:42PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > > Le March 29, 2008 03:32:35 pm Aurelien Jarno, vous avez écrit : > > > > Filipus Klutiero a écrit : > > > > > Le March 29, 2008 03:10:03 pm Aurelien Jarno, vous avez écrit : > > > > >> On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 02:23:33PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > > > >>> Package: luvcview > > > > >>> Version: 20070512-3 > > > > >>> Severity: normal > > > > >>> > > > > >>> luvcview fails to start, although I know the camera works from > > > > >>> Kopete. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> $ luvcview > > > > >>> luvcview version 0.2.1 > > > > >>> Video driver: x11 > > > > >>> A window manager is available > > > > >>> video /dev/video0 > > > > >>> Unable to set format: 22. > > > > >> > > > > >> You camera does not support the default format. Try to specify > > > > >> another format using -f yuv|jpg > > > > > > > > > > It works with yuv, but not with jpg. Should all cameras support jpg > > > > > or is it just the default that's incorrect? > > > > > > > > Not all the cameras support jpg, and not all of them support yuv. There > > > > is no sane default. > > > > > > OK, but that doesn't answer my question. Should all cameras support jpg > > > even though they don't all do it or is it luvcview which is just not > > > trying hard > > > > I don't know exactly, but I don't think they should all support jpg. > So why do you think this isn't a luvcview bug? In any case, if you don't know > exactly, surely luvcview should at least fail more cleanly. >
It does already explain the problem: "Unable to set format: 22." -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
