Le March 29, 2008 04:58:06 pm Aurelien Jarno, vous avez écrit : > On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 04:41:04PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > Le March 29, 2008 04:29:42 pm Aurelien Jarno, vous avez écrit : > > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 03:39:42PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > > > Le March 29, 2008 03:32:35 pm Aurelien Jarno, vous avez écrit : > > > > > Filipus Klutiero a écrit : > > > > > > Le March 29, 2008 03:10:03 pm Aurelien Jarno, vous avez écrit : > > > > > >> On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 02:23:33PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > > > > >>> Package: luvcview > > > > > >>> Version: 20070512-3 > > > > > >>> Severity: normal > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> luvcview fails to start, although I know the camera works from > > > > > >>> Kopete. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> $ luvcview > > > > > >>> luvcview version 0.2.1 > > > > > >>> Video driver: x11 > > > > > >>> A window manager is available > > > > > >>> video /dev/video0 > > > > > >>> Unable to set format: 22. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> You camera does not support the default format. Try to specify > > > > > >> another format using -f yuv|jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > It works with yuv, but not with jpg. Should all cameras support > > > > > > jpg or is it just the default that's incorrect? > > > > > > > > > > Not all the cameras support jpg, and not all of them support yuv. > > > > > There is no sane default. > > > > > > > > OK, but that doesn't answer my question. Should all cameras support > > > > jpg even though they don't all do it or is it luvcview which is just > > > > not trying hard > > > > > > I don't know exactly, but I don't think they should all support jpg. > > > > So why do you think this isn't a luvcview bug? In any case, if you don't > > know exactly, surely luvcview should at least fail more cleanly. > > It does already explain the problem: > > "Unable to set format: 22." Indeed, I suppose that someone familiar with the source code would understand what this means.
Anyway, since nobody is sure that the camera is the issue, wouldn't it be safer to reopen this report until someone is confident that the problem is elsewhere?
