On Wednesday 02 April 2008, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 02:21:17PM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > Justification: packaging on crack > > That's a little harsh considering the limited analysis you presented.
A little more analysis. If I ask specifically for -lboost_python-py24 or -lboost_python-py25 or -lboost_python-mt-py24 or -lboost_python-py25, kdeedu seems to build properly. If I just ask for one of the defaults (-lboost_python or -lboost_python-mt it doesn't build) > Please let me know what sequence of package installs (and what version > of libboost-python-dev) led to the situation of no symlinks. The sequence of installation described here leaves it without those symlinks: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2008/04/01/kdeedu_4%3A3.5.9-1_sid32.buildlog The build scripts tries to figure out the correct boost_python by trying the following: "-lboost_python-mt" "-lboost_python-gcc-mt-1_32" "-lboost_python-gcc-mt-1_31" "-lboost_python-gcc-mt" "-lboost_python" and see if anyone succeeds. kdeedu build doesn't fail by itself if it isn't found as it is only optional, but we test afterwards if it is actually build. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
