Dear team mates,
I have prepared a package for the djbfft library and just injected it
into the unstable trunk in pkg-multimedia SVN. I have applied a
(slightly modified) patch from Gentoo to build the shared library and
chose the package version as a SONAME for the library (which may be
changed to what you believe is appropriate, of course).
Please have a look at the package, review it and upload if
appropriate. I have allready tried to build our a52dec package against
the shared libdjbfft (--enable-djbfft) and it seems to work.
In this context, I'd like to have a new revision of a52dec uploaded to
unstable with this additional library enabled. Do you consider this
allright? There are also some other changes that I'd like to commit
for the a52dec package, i.e. convert debian/rules to CDBS and make it
lintian clean. Should I do this before or after we introduced the
libdjbfft dependency - or in the same revision?
Cheers,
Fabian
PS: Not to forget, the djbfft build system is *insane*!
--
Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik (LEAT)
Universitätsstr. 150, IB 3/134
D-44780 Bochum
Telefon: +49 (0)234 / 32-26334
Fax: +49 (0)234 / 32-14227
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
