On 13.04.08 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, > > I just noticed that there is still a tetex-base source package in > > sid, and that it is the only source package providing the > > tetex-doc binary package. With texlive uploaded quite a while > > ago, I was wondering whether this was an oversight, and whether > > we should request the removal of the source package. > > I'm not sure whether this has been discussed before - I'm just > finding this bugreport while I'm trying to reduce my mail backlog > after vacation. But anyway, it would be nice if tetex-base could > go. However, Hilmar is still working on checking tetex-doc's bugs. > Well, I guess the packages itself can go away anyway. We can go through the bugs of tetex-base, tetex-bin, tetex-doc, tetex-extra, tetex-doc-nonfree *after* the packages have been removed and either close them them or re-assign them to the TL packages. Yes, this is on my list, but (guess what) has not the highest priority. H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
