Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 13.04.08 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > >> > I just noticed that there is still a tetex-base source package in >> > sid, and that it is the only source package providing the >> > tetex-doc binary package. With texlive uploaded quite a while >> > ago, I was wondering whether this was an oversight, and whether >> > we should request the removal of the source package. >> >> I'm not sure whether this has been discussed before - I'm just >> finding this bugreport while I'm trying to reduce my mail backlog >> after vacation. But anyway, it would be nice if tetex-base could >> go. However, Hilmar is still working on checking tetex-doc's bugs. >> > Well, I guess the packages itself can go away anyway. We can go > through the bugs of tetex-base, tetex-bin, tetex-doc, tetex-extra,
ACK > tetex-doc-nonfree That's a separate source package, anyway - and AFAIR it contains material for beamer/pgf, too. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
