On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 09:31 -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > I'm looking at bug #475727 that you submitted to Debian. I am really not > sure what the bug you are reporting is... if the server refuses to store a > message that OfflineIMAP sends to it, exiting with a detailed error is, to > me, the correct behavior. OfflineIMAP cannot go mucking about with the > contents of messages, either; that is not universally the right thing to do. > > What are your thoughts?
Well, rather than aborting on each message, one by one, I'd like offlineimap to skip the message and contiue with the others. Then, at the end of the synch run, I'd like to be presented with a list of the problematic messages. When I was sorting out the mailbox that generated these problems, there were about 30-40 messages with this problem, which meant that I had to run offlineimap 30-40 times, and each time I had no idea how long it would be until it failed again... so I had to babysit the process intead of being able to leave it running overnight and sort out the failed messages the next day. > -- John -- Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
