Quoting martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> This is ugly, but only aestethically speaking.
so only a warning !?
> You setup looks weird. mdadm.conf contains /dev/md0 and you are
> already using /dev/md/d0p6 (partitionable arrays).
How about this one:
usenetgateway (amd64 with scsi controller & disks)
------------------
[APT-GET DIST-UPGRADE]
Preparing to replace mdadm 1.9.0-3 (using .../mdadm_1.9.0-4_amd64.deb) ...
Stopping RAID monitor daemon: mdadm -F.
Unpacking replacement mdadm ...
Setting up mdadm (1.9.0-4) ...
Starting raid devices: done.
Starting RAID monitor daemon: mdadm -F.
[here i received email about degraded raid arrays]
newsgate:~# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1] [multipath]
md1 : active raid1 sda2[0]
6835584 blocks [2/1] [U_]
md2 : active raid1 sda3[0]
3903680 blocks [2/1] [U_]
md3 : active raid1 sda5[0]
9767424 blocks [2/1] [U_]
md0 : active raid1 sda1[0]
979840 blocks [2/1] [U_]
unused devices: <none>
[config file was still there]
newsgate:~# cat /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf
DEVICE partitions
ARRAY /dev/md3 level=raid1 num-devices=2
UUID=308b94ec:b43cb586:660a8b7f:7dfd73fe
devices=/dev/sda5,/dev/sdb5
ARRAY /dev/md2 level=raid1 num-devices=2
UUID=c6462239:ab3eef96:3e8d00e3:0c4937b0
devices=/dev/sda3,/dev/sdb3
ARRAY /dev/md1 level=raid1 num-devices=2
UUID=e3f28ee7:b969f517:2a287ca6:f8a604fd
devices=/dev/sda2,/dev/sdb2
ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=2
UUID=825a6fe4:15c554b2:13e7c8a6:8a0e2106
devices=/dev/sda1,/dev/sdb1
newsgate:~# mdadm -a /dev/md0 /dev/sdb1
mdadm: hot added /dev/sdb1
newsgate:~# mdadm -a /dev/md1 /dev/sdb2
mdadm: hot added /dev/sdb2
newsgate:~# mdadm -a /dev/md2 /dev/sdb3
mdadm: hot added /dev/sdb3
newsgate:~# mdadm -a /dev/md3 /dev/sdb5
mdadm: hot added /dev/sdb5
newsgate:~# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1] [multipath]
md1 : active raid1 sdb2[2] sda2[0]
6835584 blocks [2/1] [U_]
[==============>......] recovery = 71.5% (4888576/6835584) finish=0.6min
speed=48282K/sec
md2 : active raid1 sdb3[2] sda3[0]
3903680 blocks [2/1] [U_]
resync=DELAYED
md3 : active raid1 sdb5[2] sda5[0]
9767424 blocks [2/1] [U_]
resync=DELAYED
md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
979840 blocks [2/2] [UU]
unused devices: <none>
It's now rebuilding.
*i* don't think it's normal that dist upgrade suddenly kicks half the
disks offline, or am i missing something ?!
Kind regards,
Danny
--
innovation is the enemy of the status quo - it puts people out of business
----- End forwarded message -----
--
innovation is the enemy of the status quo - it puts people out of business
!DSPAM:4296ae40141838186613631!
--
innovation is the enemy of the status quo - it puts people out of business
